This video covers physicists (and their intelligence), quantum physics, the double slit experiment, superposition, quantum entanglement and the essence of the world as a virtual reality.
How Nobel-Winning Physics Experiments Led to Quantum Computing | Tech News Briefing Podcast | WSJ
This year’s Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded to three scientists for their work in quantum computing.
WSJ science reporter Eric Niiler joins host Zoe Thomas to discuss their work and what it means for the future of superfast computers and encrypted communications.
What if quantum physics could eradicate illness? | Jim Al-Khalili for Big Think
Quantum biology examines quantum effects inside cells. This is a tricky field, as physicists are not comfortable working with messy biological systems, while biologists are not comfortable with complex (and seemingly irrelevant) particle physics equations.
But chemists, who straddle the space between physics and biology, know that biological molecules are part of the quantum world.
It is likely that there are quantum effects in several biological processes, such as those that generate mutations — which means that particle physics has played a role in the evolution of life on the planet.
Quantum Computers Are Coming … But Why Should You Care?
Quantum computers are the future of … everything.
They’ve been the stuff of science fiction for decades and promised by technology companies for almost as long. Although existing quantum computers can be computed on the fingers of one hand, their potential is absolutely massive. These powerful machines could help us discover more efficient carbon capture materials, make the most out of renewable energy or find the perfect formula for our next generation batteries. In other words, quantum computing could solve the most pressing issue of our time: climate change. So, when will quantum computers, with all their capabilities, begin to impact our real world? And will they really crack the code of our most puzzling enigma? Let’s see if we can come to a decision on this.
Time Crystals Explained | Answers With Joe
I recently did a live stream about the subject of time crystals, but there was much more to talk about. So here you go.
When you hear the term Time Crystals, you immediately think of something cool and sci-fi like something from Doctor Who, but spoilers… Not so much. That doesn’t mean they’re not interesting, they’re super-interesting, just… Not what powers a Tardis. The explanation that we keep hearing is that time crystals are crystals whose atomic structures repeat in space and in time. Like the reason crystals become crystals is the way the atoms of particular elements bond with each other in certain patterns that repeat over and over again. That’s repeating in three dimensions. But time crystals repeat in four dimensions. They also repeat in time. Time as a construct relies on cause and effect, one thing preceding the other, always working toward equilibrium, or a zero energy state. If you have a row of atoms repeating in a crystal, and you send energy along that line, it will pass through one atom, then another, all the way down until the system returns to equilibrium, or zero point energy. But with time crystals, atoms are connected through quantum entanglement in repeating patterns so that atoms down the chain would feel the effect before the cause, so energy sent down the line would repeat over and over again, making it impossible to return to equilibrium. That’s why they’re also called non-equilibrium matter. And that’s also why you hear so many people describe it as jello that never stops jiggling. Because even in its lowest energy state, the atoms never stop moving. Now, one question I got asked a lot in the livestream was if this breaks the law of conservation of momentum. And the answer is… Yes. It very does. Which is why this was such a big deal. And it’s something I don’t think I fully grasped in the livestream. There’s an even more fundamental law of the universe known as time translation symmetry which states that the laws of physics must work the same way everywhere at all times. And if you have matter that moves without using any energy, that sounds a lot like the laws of physics working differently. But when Nobel-prize winning physicist Frank Wilczek introduced the idea in 2012, he proposed a loophole. He stated that if symmetry is broken explicitly, then the laws of nature do not have symmetry anymore. But he argued that there’s such a thing as spontaneously broken symmetry, which means that the laws of nature still has symmetry, but nature chooses a system that does not. In other words, if the laws of nature allow these atoms to arrange in this way, then they’re still being loyal to the laws of nature. Regardless, the idea is tantalizing enough that teams of researchers have been working on it since then, and just this year, two different teams announced that they’d pulled it off. The first team from the University of Maryland, lead by Chris Monroe, took 10 ytterbium atoms and used one laser to create an electromagnetic field around the atoms, which entangled the various atoms, before blasting it with a second laser that jostled the atoms. And as predicted, once the energy was introduced, it never stopped. In fact, it started jiggling at a different rate than the laser introduced into it. This was a non-equilibrium state. But the team at Harvard did it a totally different way, by using molecules from nitrogen vacancy centers, which are tiny flaws in diamonds. But the fact that they used such different methods is encouraging, it may be that these aren’t that hard to produce and there may be hundreds of ways to do it. Which is great because there really are some cool applications for this. First of all, it makes the perfect timepiece. If you have a type of matter that oscillates at a specific frequency naturally, that’s about as accurate as you can get. But the most exciting application is for quantum computing because the entangled atoms in the atomic structure could allow stable qubits of information to be stored. Now, as always, we have to take these kinds of announcements with grains of salt. These kinds of major discoveries often have ways of falling apart under scrutiny, so we’ll have to wait and see how this holds up to peer review and future experimentation, but still… pretty exciting stuff.
How do we know the universe is quantum? What if it wasn’t?
What do we think the universe is quantum? What if the universe was not quantized?
Classical mechanics was doing just fine after Isaac Newton reduced nearly all mechanical phenomena to a single powerful equation: F=MA, James Clerk Maxwell also solved the mystery of electricity and magnetism. Classical physics is continuous. This means you can always keep dividing things into smaller pieces. But scientists realized that classical physics had some major flaws because certain phenomena could not be explained, like the color of a hot glowing body.
In 1900, Lord Rayleigh and James Jeans had used experimental data to come up with a law for how all objects emit electromagnetic radiation. The problem was that according to their theory a black body will send out energy in any frequency range allowed by the temperature. But for very energetic objects at temperatures above 5000 Kelvin, their theory predicts that the object should radiate away all its energy until it reaches absolute zero. It is called the ultra-violet catastrophe.
The solution to this problem marked the end of the classical world and the beginning of the quantum world. In 1900, Max Planck had come up with an equation to explain black body radiation. He treated radiation as being quantized, released only in discrete quanta of energy. So the emission of radiation was limited to quanta of energy, proportional to a Planck’s constant. E=hf, where the quanta of energy, E, is equal to the frequency f times Planck’s constant.
Another phenomenon that only quantum mechanics could explain was why an electron does not lose all its energy when orbiting a nucleus. If electrons orbit around the nucleus, then their circular motion means that they are constantly accelerating. But an accelerating electron means that it must be emitting photons, which means it must be losing energy. This would mean that the electron would continuously lose its orbital energy, and eventually hit the nucleus. So atoms could not exist.
Niels Bohr solved the problem by showing that only special orbits are allowed around the nucleus where the angular momentum of the electron is a whole number multiple of Planck’s constant over two pi. Light is only emitted or absorbed when electrons jump from one orbit to another.
Now to fully grasp our quantized world, we also need to account for special relativity. It was realized that the Schrodinger equation is wrong because it does not treat space and time equally. Paul Dirac fixed this problem by reformulating Schrodinger’s equation to threat space and time equally. This became the =Dirac Equation.
His equation, and later others, do not quantizing objects, but they quantize fields. And this gave rise to quantum field theory, or QFT. In QFT, particles are treated quantizations of fields. This allows us to treat space and time equally such that it satisfies special relativity.
Another big departure from classical mechanics is the idea of probabilities. The wave function in the Schrodinger equation is related to the probability of finding the particle in a given location if you were to measure it. Prior to measurement, we cannot know in advance where it will be. So the outcome is not deterministic, but probabilistic. Only the probabilities of the alternative possible outcomes are deterministic.
The world and the universe would be very different if it was not quantized. It would be a deterministic world where, theoretically the future would be predictable. But the world would not exist as we know it because, atoms could not form, quantum particles would not form. There would be no energy and no radiation. Without quantum mechanics, you could still have spacetime because general relativity does not require quantization. But this universe would be filled with nothing.
What is the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle? – Chad Orzel
The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle states that you can never simultaneously know the exact position and the exact speed of an object. Why not? Because everything in the universe behaves like both a particle and a wave at the same time. Chad Orzel navigates this complex concept of quantum physics.
China vs US: Blockchain, AI, & Quantum technology
Blockchain, AI and quantum technology are the new frontiers where China is competing with the US. These tech wars will shape Sino-US relations for the next 5 years.
While Beijing cracks down on cryptocurrencies and bitcoin mining, it quietly launched Blockchain Service Network, a platform that aims to propel China into a control position in blockchain application, an initiative in the CCP’s 13th 5 year plan. The CCP has long planned strategically for AI and quantum technology. From the “Made in China 2025” campaign in 2015, the “13th 5 Year Plan,” to the “14th 5 Year Plan,” China’s competition with the US in achieving quantum supremacy is getting intense and is a national security threat.
Google’s Plan To Create The World’s First Quantum Computer
Why Google’s Quantum Computing Project Is A Game Changer.
With Google’s record calculation speed from their supercomputer, Sycamore, we are suddenly looking at answering the questions that puzzled some of science’s greatest minds. But even better, we’re looking at possibly understanding hidden aspects of our known universe. How, you ask? Find out in this video!
Architecture All Access: Quantum Computing | Intel Technology
Quantum Computing has the potential to change our lives and far exceed the capabilities of today’s supercomputers. Join James Clarke, Director of Quantum Computing at Intel Labs, as he runs through the basics of quantum mechanics, what components make up a quantum computer, when we’ll achieve quantum practicality, and more.
During his 20 years at Intel James Clarke has been a process engineer, led advanced interconnect research, and launched Intel’s Quantum Computing efforts with a focus on leveraging our in-house transistor process and manufacturing capabilities to create scalable qubit arrays. He’s co-authored over 50 papers and holds multiple patents.
