Congress Seeks to Define ‘Blockchain’

One of the challenges of blockchain technology is its lack of interoperability between different networks. As the technology evolves, developers around the globe are working on platforms that do not play well with others.

That’s not an oversight.

There simply is no existing standards. 

Yet.

However, a bill is being introduced to as least establish a definition of blockchain itself as a basic starting point of coordinating future technological development.

H.R.6913 – Blockchain Promotion Act of 2018 is the name of the bill.

U.S. States are also trying to come up with their own definitions.  Such efforts are laudable. Yet, a broader attempt is necessary to establish an industry definition that not only crosses state lines, but ideally would be globally respected.

An industry definition is a good start to more efficient blockchain development and deployment.

4 Blockchain Benefits for Marketers

Marketing hype around the benefits of blockchain have largely focused on the financial sector.  However, the promise of opportunities for all industries and commerce in general is often advised. In brief, blockchain provides more efficient financial and informational transactions.  It also facilitates greater transparency and accountability.  And all for lower cost.

The fact that blockchain can also eliminate or minimize middlemen along operational or supply lines will disrupt the world by itself.

But what are the benefits of blockchain for the marketing and advertising sector?

The following article, How Blockchain Can Help Marketers Build Better Relationships with Their Customers, expands upon the following even further.  In brief, here are four blockchain benefits for marketers.

  • The Marketing Impact of Near-Zero Transaction Costs: Are 3% payment processing fees really worth it? Especially when margins for many companies are getting slimmer all the time? With blockchain those fees are practically nonexistent.
  • Ending the Google-Facebook Advertising Duopoly: In 2018 it’s hard to imagine a marketing plan that does not include Google Ads or Facebook Ads, or both. But it wasn’t that long ago that Facebook ads didn’t exist.  It wasn’t that much longer ago when Google Ads didn’t exist. But what if we could connect directly with consumers and pay them for their attention? They are rightfully the ones who should benefit from the marketing relationship. Personally, it’s hard for me to imagine Google and Facebook going away and it’s highly probable they have some of their best minds working on how they can use blockchain to still be relevant to marketers in the future. One thing is for future. The marketing and advertising landscape will be changing and both consumers and marketers will be the primary beneficiaries. (Especially consumers).
  • Ending Marketing Fraud and Spam: Two blockchain factors will be working against fraudsters and spammers: Transparency and micropayments, enabled by point 1 above (near zero transparency fees). It will be much harder for bad actors to hide in a blockchain world. Although I wouldn’t suggest that it will become impossible, it will be fundamentally more challenging. The internet, up to now, has made it ‘not’ challenging to be an anonymous bad actor online. The inherent transparency of blockchain will force some bad apples to go straight and others to go elsewhere. And the fact that that there could be an opportunity for companies to pay for consumers to click their links means that spammers would be pushed aside due to unworkable economics.
  • Remonetizing Media Consumption: Paying true content creators for their work is an overdue promise of the internet and may finally be delivered via blockchain. Rightful ownership of property via smart contracts is a cornerstone benefit of blockchain. Figuring out how to manage the commerce of such is being figured out in the present.

In recent years I have started becoming jaded about the internet, which may have taken me longer than others, since those of us who jumped on the internet in the mid ’90s would have been pioneers of that earlier world-changing technology. And although the world was indeed changed in profound and meaningful ways, personally, I found it disheartening to find such a massive opportunity for good also be used for less than good, as well.

Blockchain has reignited my own earlier vision of not only what the internet could be, but what a better world could be.

Blockchain’s Five Challenges

According to Deloitte, which is the largest professional services network in the world, there are five things that must happen for blockchain to see widespread adoption.

None of these are news for those following the blockchain industry. And most in the industry are also aware that progress is being made to resolve each of them. Nevertheless, here are the five items:

  • Increased performance
  • Interoperability
  • Reduced complexity, cost
  • Supportive regulation
  • More collaboration

See the complete article here:
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/10/01/five-crucial-challenges-for-blockchain-to-overcome-deloitte.html

$1B to Help EOS Flourish

https://youtu.be/c4B2S62XTvU

Block.one is the company behind the EOSIO blockchain, which is the brainchild of CTO Dan Larimer. The company bills EOSIO as “The most powerful infrastructure for decentralized applications.”

Brendan Blumer is the founder and CEO of Block.one and in the above video he discusses the company’s $1 billion investment to foster the expansion of their blockchain.

What is Monero?

When you think about Monero (XMR), think about privacy. Monero is an open-source cryptocurrency, created in April 2014, that uses a type of blockchain in which no outside observer can tell the source, amount or destination of transactions.

What that means for financial privacy advocates is good news: payments and account balances remain entirely hidden, which is not the standard for most cryptocurrencies.

The bad news is that makes Monero popular to those interested in evading law enforcement, or those on the dark web buying illegal substances.

Even the actual coins themselves differ in an important way from Bitcoin (for example). Each Monero unit is fungible. This means any two units of Monero can be mutually substituted and there is no difference between the two. Bitcoin is not.

As a further example, although any two $1 bills are equal in value, they are not fungible because each carries a unique serial number. On the other hand, two pieces of 1 oz. gold of the same grade are fungible, as both have the same value, and don’t carry any distinguishing features. Using this analogy, a Bitcoin is the $1 bill, while a Monero is the gold piece.

Monero, with its non-traceable transaction history, offers participants a much safer network and they don’t run the risk of having their crypto units being refused or blacklisted by others.

Blockchain: A New Marketing Paradigm

Eventually (in the not-too-distant future), blockchain will impact most commerce.  It will make business and operations more efficient, more accountable, more transparent and less expensive.

The rise of cryptocurrencies as a speculative asset, culminating at the end of 2017, as well as the crypto bear market of 2018, may dominate the hype cycle, but the real work of blockchain development is still in an early stage of changing the world.

In terms of blockchain as a base platform for practical applications, the financial technology sector has captured a chunk of the spotlight and the battle lines are being drawn for a new era.  How much (or little) traditional banks and governments will be able to influence global exchange of value is in the process of being determined.

However, all sectors can, and ultimately will, be influenced by blockchain.

On a fundamental level, blockchains cut out expensive middlemen such as banks and lawyers, so the opportunities for increased productivity are significant.

In relation to marketing, the following article, 7 Ways to Build Your Brand with Blockchain Marketing, suggests a new marketing paradigm:

By contrast, the blockchain offers a different approach to digital ads and marketing. The decentralized, peer-to-peer model brings the customer into equal, dynamic dialogues with businesses, and lets customers generate monetized marketing content for their favorite brands through that engagement. This implies that in the earned media blockchain ecosystem, we are all equal and active partners.

Perhaps one of the more interesting opportunities for marketers is the promise of bypassing advertising middlemen, such as Google and Facebook, and putting messages directly in front of those who are interested.  At a reduced cost, no less.  In fact, the ad payments would go to those consuming the messages. (And/or those creating messages for the brand).

Of course, in the same way that banks are going to do their best to stay relevant, by placing themselves within the blockchain, advertising middlemen, Google, Facebook, et al, will do the same. It seems probable that their ban on crypto ads this year is an attempt to pause the momentum so they can evaluate the space to their advantage.

I do not suspect that Google and Facebook will go away (although some other intermediaries probably will).  They need ad revenue to survive and they’ll figure out some way to maintain a slice of that pie.  However, expect  that names of companies with whom we are yet not familiar, will come to be just as well known, and perhaps more so, for no other reason than providing more value for less cost.

Regardless of how the advertising media landscape plays out, marketers and consumers will win.

Dan Larimer Explains EOS

Dan Larimer, CTO of EOS, discusses his latest blockchain in this video, which is edited from a number of presentations.

Larimer is noted for creating two earlier, and still popular decentralized blockchains:

  • Bitshares
  • Steem.

From those projects he conceived what he considers to be a better platform, which has led to his current development of EOS.

Philosophically, he was inspired by free markets, Austrian economics and Ron Paul. As a result he wanted to create systems that would provide freedom and are nonviolent.

Larimer’s life mission in to “Find free market solutions for securing life, liberty and property.”

Hence, we need money that is not controlled by a central authority.

He recognized the vulnerability of crypto exchanges, which could be shut down by governments, cutting the flow of digital currencies.

From that he created Bitshares (BTS) a Decentralized Asset Exchange. But that wasn’t up to the task of handling the required scalability.

He created Steem, a blockchain social media platform that rewards users for creating content. Transactions on Steem are free. But it moved away from a core principle of true decentralization.

Larimer is no longer involved with Bitshares or Steem and both of those platforms are doing well.

However, from his perspective, the industry has much to learn and with his past experience and ongoing learning he is building EOS for the purpose of establishing future applications on top of it with the intention that anyone, including himself, could develop on it.

EOS enables developers to build decentralized applications in a general purpose way, which are compatible with sustainable growth.

EOS is an open source platform that anyone can use to develop high-performance, decentralized, blockchain smart contracts.

Does Your Company Need to Create a Blockchain?

In brief, for many small- to mid-sized companies, the answer is “No.” You don’t need to create a blockchain.  You don’t even need blockchain.

Yet.

Although blockchain will likely become ubiquitous across the spectrum of business and commerce, ultimately various blockchain networks will be provided as pre-made platforms which will be faster, more transparent and less expensive than traditional services that blockchain aims to replace.

For those of us over a certain age, we may recall when credit cards were novel.  There was a period of many years when credit card transactions were evolving to become common in all businesses, large and small. 

Consider Paypal, a more recent addition to the online transaction world, which was founded in 1998 (initially as Confinity).  Paypal was not intended as way to replace credit cards, it merely facilitated their use for small business online and now there are a few hundred million users

However, blockchain will likely be integrated into world commerce and operations at a much faster rate and will eclipse the impact of credit cards and Paypal.

So why all the hype?

Continue reading “Does Your Company Need to Create a Blockchain?”

Blockchain Impacting Traditional Banking

As blockchain technology evolves from hype to practical  applications, the reality that banks (among many other middleman businesses) could become less relevant to the future of financial transactions has not been lost to those same stolid institutions.

In brief, blockchain offers the opportunity to transact finance faster, more transparently and less expensively than the services banks provide.  In fact, technically speaking, banks are not required. Hence traditional banks have  not been primary participants in the massive global movement of cryptocurrencies in the past few years.  In that light, the reality that traditional banking, as an industry, is at risk in the not-too-distant future is more real than at any point in the past.

Highlighting the point is The Financial Times reporting that JPMorgan has widened blockchain payments to more than 75 banks.

The article states that, “More than 75 of the world’s biggest banks are turning to blockchain to fight the threat of new payments rivals in what will be the regulated banking industry’s largest application of the distributed ledger technology underpinning cryptocurrencies.”

None of this would surprise those familiar with blockchain tech. But it might be surprising to those who don’t follow such developments that all the good, bad and ugly surrounding Bitcoin has real-world implications.

For all of us, our options for transacting value should continue to increase even more in the future.  Simultaneously, traditional banking should become less expensive.

Although it’s hard to envision a world where traditional banking will go away, it’s also conceivable that an all-out legal battle will ensue to mitigate loss of money and power that banks and their government partners have long enjoyed.

I would expect the blockchain circus to move from the hype of speculative irrationality to the world of courts and jurisprudence at the same time as blockchain starts to take steps towards the disintermediation of the legal profession. 

We live in interesting times.

The IBM Food Trust

https://youtu.be/QWijlTDHLMQ

The process that brings food from farm to table includes cooperation between many entities along the way.

The IBM Food Trust represents a collaborative network of growers, processors, wholesalers, distributors, manufacturers, retailers and others using blockchain to increase transparency and accountability in each step along the food supply path.

IBM describes this platform as “The only active network of its kind that directly connects participants through a permissioned, permanent and shared record of food origin details, processing data, shipping details and more.”

Ali Bouzari, cited as a Culinary Scientist and Educator, describes IBM’s Food Trust as a blockchain system that consists of digitizing information about the food supply chain in a way that’s indelible, in a way that is searchable, for instant access to records that we can have faith in.